Review Process
Join our community of expert reviewers committed to rigorous, fair, and rapid peer review. We value your time and expertise.
Double-blind review: manuscripts are anonymized
Structured rubric to guide your assessment
AI Co-Editor report provided as advisory input: You’ll receive a preliminary report generated by our AI system that checks for methodological consistency, statistical reporting, and compliance with open science standards. This report is a tool to assist, not replace, your expert judgment.
What We Look For
Soundness and rigor of methods
Clarity and reproducibility
Novelty and impact
Open science compliance
Quality of provenance (CARs, code, data). When authors provide Content-Addressable Receipts (CARs) for AI-assisted steps, you may verify them (e.g., using the Intelexta web or CLI verifier) to inspect how those AI outputs were generated. This is optional support for your judgment, not an additional requirement.
Benefits
Join our community of expert reviewers committed to rigorous, fair, and rapid peer review. We value your time and expertise.
Contribute to open, merit-based science
Honoraria & Micro-grants: We offer honoraria for completed reviews as our funding permits to thank you for your contribution.
Access to cutting-edge research at the AI-science interface
Recognition in annual reports
Tools to verify AI co-work (Intelexta-verify)
How It Works
Invitation: You’ll receive an email invitation with the manuscript’s abstract.
Accept/Decline: Accept only if your expertise aligns and you have the time.
Review: Access the anonymized manuscript and our structured review form.
Submit: Complete the rubric and provide your recommendation.
Join Our Reviewer Pool
We’re looking for experts in gauge theory, information geometry, AI research, and related fields.